Freedom and Force
January 1, 1970
There is no more basic question in life than the question of freedom and force. If there is to be order, there must be law. But with freedom there is always likely to be some violation of law. And so there must be some enforcement. But enforcement implies penalties and punishment (as well as rewards). And penalties and punishment imply some limits on freedom and perhaps some use of physical force. And if there are things we are prevented from doing, how much freedom have we? As youngsters sometimes ask: “Do I have to do it? If freedom is an inalienable right, why can’t I do what I want to do?” These aren’t easy questions, and perhaps there isn’t any easy answer – and the fact that there was once a war in heaven would seem to be the evidence of it. But part of the answer to how much freedom we have is this: Freedom can’t be uninhibited. Freedom is limited by law. Freedom stops where it infringes on the freedom of others. Another part of the answer is that the abuse of freedom may lead to its loss. Teaching people to want to do what they ought to do is one way to a fuller freedom. But even this isn’t easy. Children can usually be led with love, kindness, reason, patience, persuasion. But with children (as well as with adults) some measure of authority and force cannot always be avoided. But the mere fact that we have the authority and the power to do something doesn’t mean that the best way of doing it is by physical force. Far from it – for whenever a situation deteriorates until it can only be dealt with by physical force, it is evidence that someone, somehow, somewhere has failed, and that we have lost something that we cannot afford to lose. To quote in closing:
“Know this, that every soul is free
To choose his life and what he’ll be,
For this eternal truth is given
That God will force no man to heaven.
“He’ll call, persuade, direct aright,
And bless with wisdom, love, and light,
In nameless ways be good and kind,
But never force the human mind.”